Journal Article
RDF
pages:
-
Reply to comment by W. R. Peltier et al. on "Ocean mass from GRACE and glacial isostatic adjustment"
-
Reply to comment on "Hydrocarbon emissions characterization in the Colorado Front Range-A pilot study" by Michael A. Levi
-
Reply to Comment on “Informatics and the 2007 ndash;2008 Electronic Geophysical Year”
-
Reply to comment on "Origins of energetic ions in the cusp'' by R. Sheldon, J. Chen, and T. A. Fritz
-
Reply to Comment on 'Premature deaths attributed to source-specific BC emissions in six urban US regions'
-
Reply to Comments on "Ensoulment, Entrapment, and Political Centralization: A Comparative Study of Religion and Politics in Later Formative Oaxaca."
-
Reply to comments on "Interference from 24-GHz automotive radars to passive microwave earth remote sensing satellites"
-
Reply to De Luca, Nawab, and Kline: The proposed method to validate surface EMG signal decomposition remains problematic
-
Reply to Dr. Mougios
-
Reply to Eugene et al.: Photochemistry of aqueous pyruvic acid
-
Reply to Fitzsimmons: Transparency needed in defining fire-mitigation effort near the wildland-urban interface
-
Reply to Fontes-Villalba et al.: On a reluctance to conjecture about animal food consumption
-
Reply to Garen et al.: Within- canopy temperature data also do not support limited homeothermy
-
Reply to Godfrey et al.: Outside the box
-
Reply to Hu: Postdoctoral consortia remove barriers to retention and effectively prepare participants for career advancement
-
Reply to Kevin Kilty’s ’Comment on:Historical Science, Experimental Science, and the Scientific Method’
-
Reply to Marks
-
REPLY TO NASH: Color terms are lost, despitemissing data
-
Reply to R.J. Bailey’s ’Comment on: Historical Science, Experimental Science, and the Scientific Method’
-
reply to RC1
-
reply to RC2
-
Reply to Referee #1
-
Reply to Referee #2
-
reply to Review 1
-
reply to Review 2
-
reply to reviewer #1
-
reply to reviewer #2
-
Reply to Robinson
-
Reply to Root-Bernstein: Increasing complexity allows for the pervasiveness of low-complexity entities and is not anthropocentric
-
Reply to Roy Sorensen, 'Knowledge-lies'
pages: